Solutions · By organization

Public records software for police services, where the record is footage

Body-worn camera, in-car video, CCTV, 911 and dispatch audio, interview rooms: AccessPoint runs the request, the redaction, and the release for police services, sheriffs' offices, 911 centres, and corrections — with the exemption cited on every span, and every byte in your own Microsoft 365 tenant.

Police records units process the most demanding requests in the public sector: recordings by the hour, third-party privacy on every frame, law-enforcement exemptions with a public-interest edge, and a statutory deadline that does not scale with footage. Whether the statute is Ontario's MFIPPA for a municipal police service, a state public-records act for a sheriff's office, or the federal Access to Information Act for a national agency, it counts the days the same way it does for a memo.

Regulators have stopped accepting capacity as an excuse. British Columbia's Information and Privacy Commissioner wrote in its January 2026 surveillance guidelines that "lacking the capacity to blur or sever information to respond to an FOI request is not a valid reason under FIPPA to excuse a public body from performing this task." Ontario's Commissioner has ordered a police service to obscure the images of every individual other than the officers and the appellant, and has twice ordered that a 911 caller's voice be distorted rather than removed. Washington's Public Records Act enumerates distorting and pixelating as chargeable methods and excludes redaction time from the agency's time limits. The expectation is temporal and spatial severance, done properly and cited.

AccessPoint is built for exactly that release. It is the request system and the redaction studio in one, running in the police service's own Microsoft 365 tenant — no footage uploaded to a vendor cloud, no per-seat video add-on, and no exemption code left behind in a separate tool. The same platform runs the privacy side of the unit: impact assessments for new surveillance programs, breach response, and complaints.

Records requests at the speed of footage

Three pressures that every police records unit knows.

The clock runs at 1x, the review at 5x

Eleven hours of body-worn footage arrive on a thirty-day clock. At the rate agencies have measured — four to six analyst-hours per hour of video — that is fifty hours of review before a single exemption is decided.

Everyone in the frame is a third party

A single sidewalk clip holds bystanders, licence plates, a victim, a witness, and a child. Each face is a privacy decision, and each decision needs a citation the commissioner will read.

The disc went out unblurred

A 911 recording released with the caller's voice intact, or a body-worn clip with one face missed, is a privacy breach — and a second, differently redacted release months later is the cautionary tale every unit has heard.

What a police records unit actually needs

Whatever software you choose — including if it isn't AccessPoint — these are the capabilities that matter when the responsive record is a recording.

A clock that accounts for footage The deadline is fixed; the effort is not. The system should estimate media review from duration, support the extension and fee provisions your statute allows, and keep the request on the same calendar as every other.
Temporal and spatial severance Box, blur, or pixelate a region that follows a person through the shot; mute, bleep, or distort a voice for a span. Frame-by-frame tools cannot keep up.
Law-enforcement exemptions on the mark Your Act's law-enforcement and personal-privacy exemptions, with alternates, cited on each span — inside the request record, where an adjudicator will look for them.
Detection that stays in-house Face and on-screen text detection should propose, never apply — and run where the footage is, not in a vendor's cloud.
A release you can prove A burned file, a hash manifest, a per-span redaction log, a disposition per recording, and an audit ledger behind every decision.
Evidence that never leaves Footage stays in your own tenant, scanned for malware on upload, with an optional write-once evidence container for what you release.

How AccessPoint carries a body-worn camera request

From the request to the release, in one governed system.

Footage as a record

Body-worn, in-car, CCTV, and interview-room exports up to 2 GB upload through a resumable queue and sit beside the documents on the request. Microsoft Defender for Storage can scan every upload, and a flagged file can never be played or released.

Redact the frame and the sound

Box, blur, or pixelate a region and let automatic tracking follow the person through the clip; mute, bleep, or distort a voice for a span; withhold the whole recording where that is the decision. Every mark carries its exemption, alternates, approval, and audit entry.

Faces found in your own tenant

Detect faces and text on screen proposes one tracked region per face and flags plates, badges, and documents on screen. The face detector runs on your own App Service — nothing leaves the tenant — and a person accepts or dismisses every proposal.

911 audio by transcript

Azure AI Speech transcribes the call in your own subscription with speaker labels and timings. Find the caller's name, jump to the moment it is spoken, and accept the proposed mute — or distort the voice across the span, as regulators have ordered.

Your Act's exemptions, cited in-frame

Your jurisdiction pack's law-enforcement and privacy exemptions — Ontario's, your state's, or the federal Act's — are cited on each mark and burned into the frame as a caption at the span where the deletion is made. The redaction log records every span and its authority.

Effort and fees the statute allows

The Fees panel estimates media review from the recording's duration, four reviewer-hours per recorded hour by default. Where your statute allows charging for redaction time, the fee line is pre-filled; where it does not, the estimate still tells the unit what the request will cost.

What regulators now order

Sever both temporally and spatially — and say why at the place in the record

The orders are specific. Ontario's Commissioner has directed a police service to sever a recording between timestamps and to obscure the images of every individual other than the officers and the appellant; in two 911 cases the order was that the caller's voice be distorted so the recording no longer contains that person's personal information. British Columbia's Commissioner has said that lacking the capacity to blur or sever is not a reason to refuse. Australia's Information Commissioner asks that the schedule of documents specify the sound inserted where audio was deleted and the basis for each deletion. AccessPoint produces exactly that release: obscured regions and distorted spans, each with its citation in the frame and in the log.

Obscure, don't withhold Blur or pixelate the bystanders and release the rest, with the exemption on each region.
Distort, don't delete Keep the 911 caller's words audible and the caller unidentifiable, with the span cited.
Say what was removed and why The redaction log and index list every span, effect, and exemption for the schedule.

A body-worn camera request in AccessPoint

From the intake mailbox to the released package:

  1. The request lands from your intake mailbox with the statutory clock computed on your jurisdiction pack's calendar.
  2. Upload the footage; it is prepared for playback, scanned, and transcribed in your own subscription while the estimate of review effort appears on the Fees panel.
  3. Run Detect faces and text on screen, accept the proposals, and add region, span, and voice marks by hand where the detector cannot decide.
  4. Cite the law-enforcement or privacy exemption and alternates on each mark, route through approval, and check the Redacted preview.
  5. Export the response package — the burned MP4 or MP3, the manifest of hashes, and the redaction log — and record the disposition.

Police Services & Public Safety Questions

Can AccessPoint redact body-worn camera footage?

Yes. Body-worn, in-car, CCTV, and interview-room video up to 2 GB per file upload into the request and open in a viewer built for review. Detect faces and text on screen proposes a tracked blur for every face it finds and flags plates, badges, and documents on screen; you accept or dismiss each proposal, add box, blur, or pixelate regions that follow a subject automatically, and cite the exemption on every mark. The release is a burned MP4 with the citation captioned in the frame.

Does the footage leave our tenant?

No. AccessPoint runs inside your own Microsoft 365 and Azure tenant. Face detection and region tracking run on your own App Service with no external call; transcription and on-screen text detection use Azure AI Speech and Azure AI Document Intelligence resources deployed in your own subscription and region; and the optional media processing job runs in your subscription too. Nothing is uploaded to Realizer or to a third-party redaction service.

How long does video redaction take?

Agencies that have measured it report four to six analyst-hours per hour of footage with conventional tools. AccessPoint attacks that ratio three ways: detection proposes the faces and on-screen text so the reviewer confirms rather than hunts, automatic tracking follows a subject so one mark covers a whole appearance, and the transcript lets a reviewer find spoken names instead of listening in real time. The Fees panel shows the estimated review time for every recording so the unit can plan the request and, where the statute allows, charge for it.

Can we charge for redaction time?

It depends on your statute, and AccessPoint's fee engine follows your jurisdiction pack. Washington's Public Records Act allows charging for redacting, distorting, and pixelating body-worn camera recordings and excludes that time from the agency's response limits; the United Kingdom's fees regulations do not count redaction toward the cost limit, so it can neither be charged nor support a refusal; California's Supreme Court has held that redacting electronic records is not chargeable; Canada's federal regulations prescribe only a $5 application fee; Ontario charges no search or preparation time for a requester's own personal information, which covers most body-worn camera demand. Whatever your rules, the media review estimate is shown, and the fee line is pre-filled only where your schedule bills review time.

Which jurisdictions does it cover?

AccessPoint ships 136 jurisdiction packs — every US state, the District of Columbia, and the populated territories; every Canadian province and territory plus the federal Act; the UK and Ireland; the European Union and eighteen European regimes; Australia, New Zealand, and more. Each pack carries the law-enforcement and personal-privacy exemptions your marks cite, the calendar the clock runs on, the fee rules, and the statutory report templates.

Flat annual pricing, published in full. Every feature in every size — access requests, privacy impact assessments, breach response, complaints, video & audio redaction, and AI Assist. No per-user or per-module fees.

  • Under 500 employees$2,990/yr
  • 500–2,000 employees$7,990/yr
  • Over 2,000 employees$14,990/yr

Release the Footage. Keep the Evidence.

Try AccessPoint free for 30 days in your own Microsoft 365 tenant — video and audio redaction included, no per-seat add-on.

Start Free Trial Request a Demo